American Diploma · ACT · Reading: Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

Paired Passages: Comparing Two Authors

How to handle an ACT Reading paired-passage set: answer the Passage A questions, then the Passage B questions, then the comparison questions on agreement, disagreement and how one author would respond to the other.

American Diploma › ACT English and Reading — Complete Course

What this question type tests

In a paired-passage set, the ACT gives you two shorter passages on the same topic, labelled Passage A and Passage B, and one set of 9 questions about them. Some questions ask only about Passage A, some only about Passage B, and the rest ask you to compare the two: where the authors agree, where they disagree, and how one author would answer the other. These comparison questions belong to the reporting category Integration of Knowledge and Ideas, which is 19–26% of the scored ACT Reading questions. Every ACT form has either a paired-passage set or a passage with charts or graphs, so there is a real chance you will meet a pair on test day.

The questions are usually arranged in a helpful order: questions on Passage A first, then questions on Passage B, then questions on both passages. Use that order. It lets you treat the set as two short passages plus a few comparison questions, instead of one confusing double passage.

Question group	What it asks	Typical stems (in our own words)
Passage A only	Detail, purpose, word meaning, inference — in Passage A	"In Passage A, the author mentions … mainly to:" / "According to Passage A, …"
Passage B only	The same skills — in Passage B	"The author of Passage B objects to … because:"
Agreement	An idea both authors support	"Both authors would most likely agree that:"
Disagreement	The exact point where they differ	"The main disagreement between the authors concerns:" / "Unlike the author of Passage A, the author of Passage B …"
Response	How one author would react to a specific line in the other passage	"How would the author of Passage B most likely respond to the claim in Passage A, paragraph 2, that …?"
Relationship / difference	How B relates to A as a whole; differences in evidence, tone or purpose	"Which choice best describes how Passage B relates to Passage A?" / "A difference between the passages is that:"

The method: A, then B, then both

Read the blurb. It tells you who wrote each passage: a planner and a shopkeeper, a scientist and a farmer, a teacher and a musician. An author's job often explains his or her point of view.
Read Passage A only. Make a quick 3-word map of its paragraphs and say its main claim in one sentence: "A: start with reading."
Answer the Passage A questions now, while Passage A is fresh. Do not look at Passage B yet; it can only confuse you.
Read Passage B. As you read, ask one question all the time: "Is B agreeing with A, disagreeing, or agreeing in part?" Say B's claim in one sentence.
Answer the Passage B questions.
Before the comparison questions, write a three-line summary: A thinks … / B thinks … / Both accept … This takes 20 seconds and saves minutes.
Answer the comparison questions. For each choice, find the proof in A AND the proof in B. If you can find only one, the choice is wrong.

ترتيب الحل

متقراش القطعتين ورا بعض وبعدين تحل. اقرا A وحل أسئلة A بس، بعدين اقرا B وحل أسئلة B، وفي الآخر حل الأسئلة اللي عن الاتنين. وقبل أسئلة الاتنين اكتب سطر صغير: A رأيه كذا / B رأيه كذا / متفقين على كذا.

Classifying the relationship between the passages

Most comparison questions become easy once you have named the relationship. On the ACT, two authors rarely disagree about everything. Much more often the second author qualifies the first: accepts part of the view and adds a limit, a condition or a different order.

Relationship	What it means	Signal words in Passage B
Agrees / extends	Same position, with new support or a new example	similarly, I share, indeed, what is more
Disagrees	Opposite position on the same question	but, however, the opposite is true, mistaken, I reject
Qualifies	Accepts part of A's view, adds conditions or limits	this does not mean …, some … others, it depends on, only when
Questions the evidence	Doubts HOW A supports the claim, not necessarily the claim itself	a single case, not typical, before you decide, measure
Different focus	Same topic, but B discusses another side of it (causes vs. solutions, past vs. present)	a different question, another reason, what is often forgotten

Five rules for the comparison questions

Rule 1 — "Both agree" needs proof in both passages. A choice that is true for one author only is the most common trap in the whole set.

✓ "Both authors think reading music is useful." — A builds her method on reading; B calls it "a valuable tool."
✗ "Both authors think children should start with notation." — Only A says this. B says the opposite.

Rule 2 — A response question is answered from the responding author's words. If the stem asks how author B would respond, look for the place in B that discusses the same idea, then choose the answer that B's words support. Do not use your own opinion and do not use A's words.

✓ B would answer A's "students reach a wall" with his own story: he learned to read later, in a few months.
✗ B would agree that students reach a wall. — This takes A's words as if B had said them.

Rule 3 — Find the exact point of disagreement. Authors who disagree usually still agree on several things. The right answer names the narrow point they fight about, not the whole topic.

✓ "They disagree about the ORDER in which reading and playing by ear should be learned."
✗ "They disagree about whether music lessons are important." — Too broad: both clearly think lessons matter.

Rule 4 — Keep each author's strength of language. If B says "some streets may lose trade," B does not say "all car-free streets fail." A choice that makes an author more extreme than the text is wrong.

✓ "B would accept closing some streets under certain conditions."
✗ "B believes that closing streets always harms shops." — Too extreme: B qualifies; he does not reject.

Rule 5 — "Difference" questions can be about HOW, not only WHAT. The passages may differ in the kind of evidence (personal story vs. measurement), in tone (enthusiastic vs. cautious) or in purpose (proposing a plan vs. warning about one). Check both halves of every "A does X, while B does Y" choice: one true half is not enough.

✓ "A relies on a teacher's observation of her students, while B relies on his own experience as a learner."
✗ "A relies on a survey of parents, while B relies on his own experience." — Half-right: the second half is true, the first is invented.

Worked examples

Two short texts (shorter than real ACT passages, so we can focus on the method). Read them, then study each question and why every wrong choice fails.

Text 1 (a museum director): When our museum began opening its doors free of charge on the first Friday of every month, attendance on those evenings tripled. Families pushed prams through galleries that had been almost empty on ordinary weekday evenings. Free entry, I am convinced, is the surest way to bring a museum to people who have never visited one.

Text 2 (a researcher who studies museum visitors): Free-entry days are popular, but popularity is not the same as reaching new audiences. When visitors on free days are asked about their habits, many turn out to be regular museum-goers who have simply chosen the cheapest evening. A museum that wants people who have never visited may need to go further, for example by running events in neighbourhoods far from the city centre.

Worked example 1 — how would author 2 respond?

Question: The researcher in Text 2 would most likely respond to the director's final claim in Text 1 by:

A) agreeing that free entry is the surest way to attract new visitors.
B) denying that attendance rose on free-entry evenings.
C) arguing that museums should charge more on ordinary evenings.
D) questioning whether the extra visitors were mainly people who had never visited before.

Answer: D. Text 2 grants that free days are "popular" but says "popularity is not the same as reaching new audiences," because many free-day visitors are regulars. The researcher challenges the director's conclusion, not his attendance figures.

A is wrong — Reversed: the researcher says a museum "may need to go further."
B is wrong — Too extreme: Text 2 accepts that free days are popular; it questions WHO came, not how many.
C is wrong — Outside both texts: prices on ordinary evenings are never discussed.

Worked example 2 — what both authors agree on

Question: Both authors would most likely agree that free-entry days:

A) attract large numbers of visitors.
B) are the best way to reach new audiences.
C) should be replaced by events in distant neighbourhoods.
D) are attended mostly by regular museum-goers.

Answer: A. Text 1: attendance "tripled." Text 2: "Free-entry days are popular." Popularity is the shared ground — proof in both texts.

B is wrong — Only the director believes this (true for one author only).
C is wrong — Too extreme even for the researcher, who says museums should go "further," not that free days should end.
D is wrong — Only the researcher says this, and she says "many," not "mostly."

Worked example 3 — the relationship between the texts

Question: Which choice best describes how Text 2 relates to Text 1?

A) It offers further evidence for the conclusion reached in Text 1.
B) It accepts a fact reported in Text 1 but challenges the conclusion drawn from it.
C) It rejects every claim made in Text 1.
D) It discusses a problem that has no connection to Text 1.

Answer: B. The fact (free days are busy) is accepted; the conclusion (free entry is the surest way to reach new people) is challenged. This is the classic "qualify / question the evidence" relationship.

A is wrong — Reversed: Text 2 weakens Text 1's conclusion; it does not support it.
C is wrong — Too extreme: the researcher agrees that free days are popular.
D is wrong — Off-topic: both texts discuss exactly the same free-entry days.

Worked example 4 — a difference in evidence

Question: A difference between the two texts is that Text 1 relies mainly on:

A) a survey of visitors, while Text 2 relies on attendance figures.
B) a long-term study of several museums, while Text 2 relies on one evening.
C) what the director observed at his own museum, while Text 2 relies on what visitors report about their habits.
D) expert opinion, while Text 2 relies on the history of museums.

Answer: C. The director reports attendance ("tripled") and what he saw (families with prams). The researcher uses visitors' answers when "asked about their habits." Both halves of C are true.

A is wrong — Reversed: the survey belongs to Text 2, the attendance figures to Text 1.
B is wrong — Invented: neither text describes a long-term study, and Text 2 is not about one evening.
D is wrong — Neither half fits: no expert is quoted in Text 1, and Text 2 says nothing about history.

Classic traps

Right idea, wrong author. A choice that is true for Passage A is offered in a Passage B question (or in a "both" question). Label every idea in your notes A or B.
Assuming total disagreement. Paired authors usually share some ground. If a choice says B "rejects everything" A says, check again.
Making an author more extreme. "May," "some" and "often" in the passage cannot become "always," "all" and "never" in the answer.
Answering a response question from your own opinion. The answer comes from the responding author's own words.
Half-right comparisons. In "A does X, while B does Y" choices, one false half makes the whole choice wrong.
Too-broad disagreements. The correct answer names the narrow point of conflict (order, method, evidence), not the whole topic.

Fast strategy for test day

Blurb first: who wrote each passage?
Read A → answer A questions → read B → answer B questions → answer "both" questions.
Before the "both" questions, write: A thinks … / B thinks … / Both accept …
Name the relationship: agrees, disagrees, qualifies, questions the evidence, different focus.
For every comparison choice, put one finger on the proof in A and one on the proof in B.
Aim for about 10 minutes for the whole set of 9 questions.

أهم فخ في القطع المزدوجة

أشهر فخ: اختيار صحيح بس لكاتب واحد بيتحط في سؤال «الاتنين متفقين على». لازم تلاقي الدليل في القطعة A وفي القطعة B. وكمان الكاتب التاني نادرًا ما بيرفض كل كلام الأول، غالبًا بيوافق على جزء ويحط شرط أو ترتيب مختلف. ولو السؤال «الكاتب B هيرد إزاي؟» جاوب من كلام B نفسه مش من رأيك.

Practice

A full paired-passage set: two passages of about 350 words each and 9 questions, as on the real test. It is untimed, but aim for about 10 minutes. Follow the method: Passage A questions (1–3), Passage B questions (4–5), then the comparison questions (6–9).

Remember

Every ACT form has either a paired-passage set or a passage with charts or graphs; the set has 9 questions.
Order: Passage A questions → Passage B questions → questions on both.
Name the relationship before you answer: agrees, disagrees, qualifies, questions the evidence, different focus.
"Both agree" = proof in both passages; "B would respond" = proof in B's own words.
Keep each author's exact strength of language: "some" never becomes "all."

All pages in this course

ACT English

ACT Reading