AAAbdelkriem AcademyEducate Me Up

American Diploma · ACT · English: Sentence Structure

Sentence Fragments

Every sentence needs a subject and a finite main verb — the five ways the ACT builds a fragment, the strip test, how to fix them, and a 10-question ACT-style practice.

American Diploma › ACT English and Reading — Complete Course

What this question type tests

Fragment questions belong to the Conventions of Standard English reporting category of the ACT English test, which is 38–43% of the English score together with punctuation and usage. The English test has 50 questions (40 scored) in 35 minutes, spread over five essays: three of about 340 words with 10 questions each and two of about 185 words with 5 questions each.

The ACT never asks "Is this a fragment?" Instead, part of the essay is underlined and numbered, and you choose the best of four versions — the first is usually NO CHANGE. A fragment item is easy to recognise once you know the signs: the choices change a verb form (grows / growing / to grow / which grows), add or remove a word such as which, who, because, although, or move a period to a new place. When you see these differences, ask one question: does every sentence still have a subject and a main verb?

الفكرة في سطر واحد

كل جملة لازم يكون فيها فاعل (subject) + فعل أساسي حقيقي (main verb) + معنى كامل. لو الكلام بيبدأ بحرف كبير وبينتهي بنقطة ومفيهوش فعل أساسي، يبقى fragment = غلط. الفعل اللي فيه ing لوحده أو to + فعل مش فعل أساسي.

The rule: subject + finite main verb + complete thought

A complete sentence (an independent clause) needs three things: a subject (who or what the sentence is about), a finite main verb (a verb that shows tense and can work alone with its subject), and a complete thought (it is not introduced by a word that makes it depend on another clause).

Finite verbs ✓ (can be the main verb)Non-finite forms ✗ (cannot be the main verb alone)
grows, grew, is growing, has grown, will grow, can growgrowing (no helping verb)
was built, has been built, is builtbuilt (as a description: "built in 1920")
decided, decides, had decidedto decide
is, was, are, werebeing, having been
  • ✗ The festival being the biggest event of the year.
  • ✓ The festival is the biggest event of the year.
  • ✗ The bridge built by Italian engineers in 1902.
  • ✓ The bridge was built by Italian engineers in 1902.
  • ✓ The bridge, built by Italian engineers in 1902, still carries traffic. ("built" is a description inside commas; the main verb is "carries")

Notice the last pair: an -ing or -ed word is not wrong in itself. It is only wrong when it is the only verb the subject has.

The five ways the ACT builds a fragment

1. A dependent clause standing alone. Words like because, although, though, while, when, whenever, since, if, unless, until, after, before, as, whereas, even though, so that turn a full sentence into a dependent clause. It now needs an independent clause next to it.

  • ✗ The village school closed for two weeks. Because the roof leaked after a storm.
  • ✓ The village school closed for two weeks because the roof leaked after a storm.
  • ✗ Although the tickets were expensive. The concert sold out in an hour.
  • ✓ Although the tickets were expensive, the concert sold out in an hour.

2. An -ing, -ed or to-verb phrase used instead of a main verb.

  • ✗ The new solar plant near Aswan producing enough electricity for thousands of homes.
  • ✓ The new solar plant near Aswan produces enough electricity for thousands of homes.
  • ✗ The team worked through the night. Hoping to finish the model before the competition.
  • ✓ The team worked through the night, hoping to finish the model before the competition.
  • ✗ The aim of the campaign to plant a tree for every student.
  • ✓ The aim of the campaign was to plant a tree for every student.

3. A noun + who/which/that clause, but no main verb. The verb is "trapped" inside the relative clause, so the main subject never gets its own verb. This is the ACT's favourite fragment.

  • ✗ The scientist who discovered the tomb in 1922.
  • ✓ The scientist discovered the tomb in 1922.
  • ✓ The scientist who discovered the tomb in 1922 became famous overnight.
  • ✗ A small museum in Rosetta, which displays maps of the old city.
  • ✓ A small museum in Rosetta displays maps of the old city.

4. A long subject that never gets its verb. The ACT adds so many describing words (prepositional phrases, appositives, lists) that you forget the verb is missing.

  • ✗ The old railway station on Ramses Street, with its tall clock tower and its windows painted by Italian craftsmen more than a century ago.
  • ✓ The old railway station on Ramses Street, with its tall clock tower and its windows painted by Italian craftsmen more than a century ago, is now a museum.

5. A period in the wrong place. A complete sentence is cut in two, and the second half (a phrase or a dependent clause) is left alone. The fix is to remove the period and join the piece to the sentence it belongs to.

  • ✗ Neighbours meet on the roof every evening. Making it a place of friendship.
  • ✓ Neighbours meet on the roof every evening, making it a place of friendship.
  • ✗ She studied medicine in Alexandria. Where her grandfather had once taught.
  • ✓ She studied medicine in Alexandria, where her grandfather had once taught.
خلي بالك من who / which

لو الجملة بتبدأ باسم وبعده who أو which أو that، الفعل اللي بعدهم بيبقى بتاع الجملة الصغيرة. لازم تدوّر على فعل تاني للاسم الأساسي. مثال: The man who lives next door. ← ناقصة. The man who lives next door is a doctor. ← كاملة.

Subtle cases the ACT likes

  • Adding "which" or "who" can destroy a good sentence. ✓ Hoda trains every morning. ✗ Hoda, who trains every morning. One small word removed the main verb.
  • "Being" is almost never the answer. ✗ The result being a delay of three weeks. ✓ The result was a delay of three weeks.
  • Two dependent clauses do not make a sentence. ✗ Although the road was closed because the bridge was weak. Both clauses depend on something that is not there.
  • A short sentence can be complete. ✓ It rained. ✓ Nobody came. Length does not decide; subject + finite verb does.
  • Commands are complete. ✓ Return the books by Thursday. The subject "you" is understood.
  • Starting with And or But does not make a fragment. ✓ But the plan failed. It still has a subject and a main verb. Do not choose an answer just to remove "But".
  • "That" after the subject can create a fragment. ✓ The report shows a rise in prices. ✗ The report that shows a rise in prices.

A 3-step method: the strip test

  1. Strip the sentence: cross out any dependent clause (because…, although…, who…, which…, that…), anything between a pair of commas or dashes, and prepositional phrases (in…, of…, with…).
  2. Look at what is left. Is there a subject and a finite verb that could stand alone? Example: "The old railway station ~~on Ramses Street, with its tall clock tower…~~" → only "The old railway station" is left: no verb, so it is a fragment.
  3. Fix it with the smallest change the choices offer (see the table below), then read the whole sentence again with the sentence before and after.

A useful check: put "I know that…" in front of the words. "I know that the bridge was built in 1902" makes sense, so it is a complete clause. "I know that the bridge built in 1902" does not, so it is a fragment. (Dependent clauses fail this test too: "I know that because the roof leaked" — no.)

How to fix a fragment

ProblemFixExample ✓
-ing / -ed / to-verb instead of a verbChange it to a finite verbThe plant produces enough electricity…
Noun + who/which/that, no main verbRemove who/which/that (or add a main verb later)A small museum in Rosetta displays maps…
Dependent clause aloneJoin it to the neighbouring sentence (comma or no comma), or remove the subordinating word…closed for two weeks because the roof leaked.
Phrase cut off by a periodReplace the period with a comma and attach it…every evening, making it a place of friendship.
Long subject, no verbAdd the missing verb…painted by Italian craftsmen, is now a museum.

Careful: when you attach a dependent clause, do not use a semicolon. A semicolon joins two complete sentences only (the teacher's rule), so "…two weeks; because the roof leaked" is still wrong.

Worked examples

Worked example 1 — dependent clause cut off by a period

Passage: The village school closed for two weeks in __March. Because__ the roof leaked after a heavy storm.

Choose the best version of the underlined portion.

  • A) NO CHANGE
  • B) March because
  • C) March; because
  • D) March, it was because

Answer: B

  • A) ✗ Wrong: "Because the roof leaked after a heavy storm." is a dependent clause standing alone — a fragment.
  • B) ✓ Correct: The because-clause is attached to the main clause. No comma is needed when because comes after the main clause.
  • C) ✗ Wrong: A semicolon must have a complete sentence on both sides; "because the roof leaked…" is not one.
  • D) ✗ Wrong: Comma splice — "The village school closed…" and "it was because…" are two independent clauses joined only by a comma.

Worked example 2 — -ing word instead of a main verb

Passage: The new solar plant near Aswan __producing__ enough electricity for thousands of homes.

Choose the best version of the underlined portion.

  • A) NO CHANGE
  • B) producing, as a result,
  • C) produces
  • D) which produces

Answer: C

  • A) ✗ Wrong: "producing" cannot be a main verb alone, so the subject "plant" has no verb.
  • B) ✗ Wrong: Adding words does not add a verb — still a fragment.
  • C) ✓ Correct: "produces" is a finite present-tense verb: subject "plant" + verb "produces".
  • D) ✗ Wrong: "which produces" puts the verb inside a relative clause. "The new solar plant which produces…" has no main verb — the trapped-verb fragment.

Worked example 3 — long subject with a relative clause

Passage: A small museum in Rosetta, which displays copies of ancient stones and maps of the old city, __attracting__ thousands of students each year.

Choose the best version of the underlined portion.

  • A) NO CHANGE
  • B) attracts
  • C) that attracts
  • D) and it attracts

Answer: B

  • A) ✗ Wrong: "displays" belongs to the which-clause, and "attracting" is not finite, so "museum" has no main verb.
  • B) ✓ Correct: Strip the which-clause between the commas: "A small museum in Rosetta attracts thousands of students" — complete.
  • C) ✗ Wrong: Another relative clause; the museum still has no main verb.
  • D) ✗ Wrong: "A small museum…, and it attracts" — the first part still has no verb, and "it" repeats the subject.

Worked example 4 — a NOT question

Passage: Many desert plants store water in their thick __leaves. This allows__ them to survive for months without rain.

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion would NOT be acceptable?

  • A) leaves; this allows
  • B) leaves, which allow
  • C) leaves, allowing
  • D) leaves. Allowing

Answer: D

  • A) ✓ Acceptable: A semicolon joins two complete, closely related sentences.
  • B) ✓ Acceptable: "which allow them…" is a dependent clause correctly attached to the main sentence with a comma.
  • C) ✓ Acceptable: The -ing phrase is attached to a complete sentence, so it simply adds information.
  • D) ✗ The answer: NOT acceptable. "Allowing them to survive for months without rain." has no subject and no finite verb — a fragment. On a NOT question, the error IS the answer.
Classic traps
  • The trapped verb: "The engineer who designed the bridge." There is a verb (designed), but it belongs to the who-clause.
  • The -ing disguise: "The museum, holding over 5,000 coins." Looks long and serious, but has no main verb.
  • The "being" choice: any choice with "being" as the only verb is almost always wrong.
  • The semicolon fix that fails: "; because…", "; which…", "; making…" — the right side of a semicolon must be a complete sentence.
  • The over-fix: the original was already complete, but a choice adds which/who/that and breaks it. NO CHANGE is right more often than students think.
  • The lonely period: a period before a phrase that clearly belongs to the previous sentence ("…every evening. Making it…").
Fast strategy for test day
  • Look at the four choices first: if they differ in verb form (-ing / -s / -ed / to) or in which/who/because, think "fragment".
  • Strip the sentence: remove dependent clauses and anything between commas. Is a subject + finite verb left?
  • If the underline contains a period, read both sides: each must be a complete sentence.
  • Prefer the choice that gives the main subject a finite verb with the fewest extra words.
  • Always read the sentence before and after — a fragment often belongs to its neighbour.
طريقة الحل السريعة

اشطب أي جملة بتبدأ بـ because / although / which / who، واشطب أي كلام بين فاصلتين. لو اللي فاضل فيه فاعل وفعل حقيقي (مش ing ومش to) يبقى الجملة سليمة. لو مفيش فعل، اختار الاختيار اللي بيحط فعل حقيقي، أو اللي بيشيل النقطة ويلزّق الكلام بالجملة اللي قبله.

Practice

Two short ACT-style essays, 5 questions each. Every item tests fragments — sometimes the correct answer is NO CHANGE. Explanations appear after you answer.

Remember
  • Complete sentence = subject + finite main verb + complete thought.
  • -ing, -ed (as a description), to + verb and "being" cannot be the main verb alone.
  • A verb inside a who/which/that clause does not count as the main verb.
  • because / although / when … + clause = dependent: attach it to a main clause, never after a semicolon.
  • Strip the sentence, find the subject and its verb, and fix with the smallest change.
All pages in this course

ACT English

ACT Reading